Skip to content

Vibrant Variant

Balanced energy with slightly toned-down saturation for everyday coding.

Overview

Vibrant offers 85% intensity: still electric, but easier on the eyes for longer sessions. The perfect middle ground between Neon's intensity and Soft's gentleness.

PropertyValue
Background#0f0c1a
Foreground#f8f8f2
Intensity85%
TypeDark

Color Palette

Primary Colors

ColorHexUsage
Purple#ff00ffKeywords, control flow
Cyan#00ffccFunctions, methods
Pink#ff00ccTags, booleans
Pink Soft#ff99ffStrings
Coral#ff5fa8Numbers, constants
Yellow#ffcc00Classes, types

Supporting Colors

ColorHexUsage
Green#00ff66Success, git additions
Red#ff3366Errors, git deletions
Blue#6699ffLinks, info
Gray#728989Line numbers, non-text glyphs
Comment#b366ffComments

Terminal Colors

yaml
# ANSI Colors
black: "#0f0c1a"
red: "#ff3366"
green: "#00ff66"
yellow: "#ffcc00"
blue: "#6699ff"
magenta: "#ff00cc"
cyan: "#00ffcc"
white: "#f8f8f2"

# Bright variants
bright_black: "#728989"
bright_red: "#ff6677"
bright_green: "#66ff99"
bright_yellow: "#ffff66"
bright_blue: "#88aaff"
bright_magenta: "#ff66ff"
bright_cyan: "#00ffff"
bright_white: "#ffffff"

When to Use

  • Everyday coding with balanced energy
  • Want electric colors without overwhelming intensity
  • Working for medium-length sessions
  • Prefer a slightly deeper background

Configuration

lua
require("silkcircuit").setup({
  variant = "vibrant",
})
vim.cmd.colorscheme("silkcircuit")

Or switch at runtime:

vim
:SilkCircuit vibrant

Comparison

Vibrant sits between Neon and Soft:

vs NeonSlightly less saturated, deeper background
vs SoftMore energy and contrast
vs GlowLighter backgrounds, less intense glow